Cases 81 - 90 of 3,927
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. McAllister
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Austin Chance Evans
Defendant:
Megann Nicole McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DeCastro v. Mcknight et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jose M DeCastro
Defendant:
Evan Mcknight, Pam Wagner, Brad Spoljaric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson, et al. v. Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue, et al.
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DAVID PETERSON, JAY STICKNEY, BEAU WATSON and others
Defendant:
SNOHOMISH REGIONAL FIRE AND RESCUE and KEVIN O'BRIEN, Chief
Center for Investigative Reporting, et al. v. United States Department of Labor
as 24-880
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING and WILL EVANS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Evans Adhesive Corporation v. Golden State Adhesives, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00026
Plaintiff:
EVANS ADHESIVE CORPORATION,
Defendant:
GOLDEN STATE ADHESIVES, INC.
Alston v. City of Phoenix, et al.
as 24-793
Plaintiff:
FELICIA MICHELLE ALSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHOENIX, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SONYA SPELLS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Amanda Wilde v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilde
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Social Services, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
