Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Roy v. Federal Election Commission et al
as 1:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission, Homeland Security Dept., US General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jowell Finley v. J. Mineau, et al
as 08-16867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOWELL FINLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MINEAU, M.C. KRAMER and J.S. WOODFORD
Stewart v. Kernan et al
as 2:2008cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jesse Stewart
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, J. Flint, J.S. Zuber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovaas et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
Patty Lovaas and Beaverhead County Public Lands Management Trust
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Bruce Ramsey, Thomas Osen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust v. Vail et al
as 2:2007mc00146
Plaintiff:
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust
Defendant:
Mike Vail
Garnishee:
J.S. Vail, LLC
Coleman v. State of California et al
as 1:2007cv01125
Plaintiff:
Sherry Coleman
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, James C. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pena v. Blackwell et al
as 2:2007cv01539
Plaintiff:
Ignacio P. Pena
Defendant:
R M Blackwell, B Holyfield, J.S. Fecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Tillis v. Woodford
as 3:2007cv00524
Petitioner:
John A. Tillis
Respondent:
J.S. Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillis v. Woodford
as 3:2007cv00420
Petitioner:
John A. Tillis
Respondent:
J.S. Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
