Cases 81 - 90 of 109
Terra M Wilson et al v. Superior Court of California et al
as 8:2009cv00942
Plaintiff:
Terra M Wilson and Richard L Wilson
Defendant:
Superior Court of California and Orange County Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kay L Wilson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez v. Adams et al
as 1:2009cv01284
Petitioner:
Everett Galindo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, C. Gardemal, L. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Uribe
as 3:2009cv00633
Petitioner:
Stephen L Wilson
Respondent:
D Uribe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wilson
as 3:2008cv05133
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission, Securities & Exchange Commission and Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jonathan L. Wilson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Knopf v. Semel et al
as 5:2008cv03658
Plaintiff:
Andrew Knopf, Andrew Knopf, Andrew Knopf and others
Defendant:
Terry Semel, Michael J. Callahan, Jerry Yang and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wilson et al v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv03071
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wilson, II and April Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Matthew Young v. Max Williams, et al
as 08-35431
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW ROBERT YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
MAX WILLIAMS, Dir. of Corrections, GUY HALL, Two Rivers Corr. Inst. Supt., SOBOTTA, TCRI Counselor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Watkins v. Semel et al
as 3:2008cv02359
Plaintiff:
Jill Watkins and Jill Watkins
Defendant:
Terry S. Semel, Terry S. Semel, Terry S. Semel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
