Cases 81 - 90 of 105
David Stookey v. U.S. Postal Service Agent Tammy L. Enriquez
as 2:2010cv04318
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service Tammy L. Enriquez
Plaintiff:
David Stookey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-16274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Srikanth Tangirala v. USDCSAC
as 10-70152
:
In re: SRIKANTH TANGIRALA
Petitioner:
SRIKANTH TANGIRALA
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Cable Shopping Network et al
as 3:2009cv01016
Plaintiff:
L.C. Gay
Defendant:
Cable Shopping Network, Discover Card Services and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-15814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. U.S. Postal Service
as 3:2009cv05226
Plaintiff:
Kari Lee Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
21st Century Insurance Company v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 2:2009cv02376
Plaintiff:
21st Century Insurance Company
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
United States of America v. $6,500.00 In U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2009cv01422
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$6,500.00 In U.S. Currency and Six U.S. Postal Service Money Orders Valued at $4,995.00
Claimant:
Mohamed Sallieu Bah
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
AMCO Insurance Company v. U.S. Postal Service
as 3:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
AMCO Insurance Company
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
