Cases 81 - 90 of 126
Christopher Bailey v. Steve Shelton, et al
as 12-35171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, MD, Individual capacity, GREGG LYTLE, MD, Individual capacity and B. WHELAN, Manager, Individual capacity
Appleton Pickett, Jr. v. Max Williams, et al
as 11-35933
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APPLETON PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MAX WILLIAMS, DON MILLS, GUY HALL and others
Henry v. Atoch et al
as 3:2011cv05740
Plaintiff:
William F. Henry
Defendant:
Brandon Atoch , City of Oakville , Grays Harbor County and others
Counter_claimant:
City of Oakville
Counter_defendant:
William F. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Edmundo Pardo Rubi v. Patrick K. O'Toole
as 2:2011cv06695
Defendant:
Cynthia G Aaron, Jan M Adler, Edwin Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Edmundo Pardo Rubi
In re: Thomas J. Whelan
as 11-80148
Respondent:
In re: THOMAS J. WHELAN, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: March 16, 2009
Panico v. Thermea et al
as 3:2011cv02378
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Miles Industries Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Melissa Panico and Sean Whelan
Defendant:
Baxi Group and BDR Thermea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Whelan v. BDR Thermea et al
as 3:2011cv02146
Plaintiff:
Sean Whelan
Defendant:
BDR Thermea, Baxi Group and Miles Industries Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv08058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
