Cases 1 - 10 of 24
(HC) Dillon v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00623
Petitioner:
Akeem Dillon
Respondent:
Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cornell, et al. v. Montgomery
as 24-1304
Petitioner:
QUIAD AKEEM CORNELL
Respondent:
WARREN L. MONTGOMERY
Schroeder v. Turnbull et al
as 2:2023cv02584
Plaintiff:
Chris Joe Schroeder
Defendant:
Akeem Turnbull and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Bell, Sr. v. Cheryl Feuerstein, et al
as 23-35497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LYDELL BELL, Sr., and any other same like situated circumstances
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL J. FEUERSTEIN, Personal Representative of Estate, RAYLYNNA J. PETERSON, MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY and others
Roberts et al v. Avocado Mattress L.L.C.
as 3:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
Richard Roberts and Akeem Pina
Defendant:
Avocado Mattress L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jamerson v. Mackal
as 3:2023cv08070
Plaintiff:
Passion B Jamerson
Defendant:
Akeem Mackal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quaid Akeem Cornell v. Warren L. Montgomery
as 5:2022cv02261
Petitioner:
Quaid Akeem Cornell
Respondent:
Warden Warren L. Montgomery and Warren L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08432
Plaintiff:
Akeem Young
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Feuerstein et al
as 3:2022cv01688
Plaintiff:
Larry Lydell Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Cheryl J. Feuerstein, Raylynna J. Peterson, Merchants Bonding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
