Cases 1 - 10 of 7,520
Allen v. Barrick Gold of North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Wade Allen
Defendant:
Barrick Gold of North America, Inc. and Turner Staffing Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quantrille v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03083
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Quantrille
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reges v. Cauce, et al.
as 24-3518
Plaintiff:
STUART REGES
Defendant:
ANA MARI CAUCE, in her official capacity as President of the University of Washington, MAGDALENA BALAZINSKA, in her official and individual capacities as Director of the Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, DAN GROSSMAN, in his official and individual capacities as Vice Director of the Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering and others
Mutaher et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Mouad Mutaher and Ismail Ibrahim
Defendant:
Ryan James Martin, Brandon L. Allen and Grove Computer Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lecia L. Shorter v. The State of California et al
as 2:2024cv02799
Defendant:
Gina Clark Keaveny, SMBC Manubank, The State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Lecia L. Shorter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3465
Plaintiff:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3467
Plaintiff:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES WALKER, SAMUEL MCALPINE, CHERYL BAKEWELL and others
DN Tanks Mgmt, LLC et al v. Speedie
as 3:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
DN Tanks Mgmt, LLC, DN Tanks, LLC and DN Tanks, Inc.
Defendant:
Allen M. Speedie
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
