Cases 1 - 10 of 2,040
Herrera v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
Victor Giovanni Herrera
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campbell v. Herrera, et al.
as 24-3296
Plaintiff:
SENARBLE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
C. HERRERA, JOSHUA J. TANTON, FREDERICK MARTIN and others
Herrera Marin, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3258
Petitioner:
DIANA HERRERA MARIN and SAMUEL REYES HERRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera-Martinez v. Garland
as 24-3273
Petitioner:
EDUARDO ALFONSO HERRERA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Cano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3211
Petitioner:
ANA LETICIA RAMOS CANO, ARELI HERRERA RAMOS and JUAN HERRERA RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera v. Lifemap Assurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Sonia Herrera
Defendant:
Lifemap Assurance Company, Swire Pacific Holdings Incorporated and Swire Pacific Holdings Incorporated Active Non-Union Employees Health and Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Herrera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05374
Plaintiff:
Cassidy B Herrera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Herrera Padron v. Garland
as 24-2991
Petitioner:
ABIGAIL MARGARITA HERRERA PADRON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thelma Herrera Cordova v. CEVA International Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03910
Plaintiff:
Thelma Herrera Cordova
Defendant:
CEVA International Inc., CEVA Freight Management International Group, Inc., CEVA Contract Logistics U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
