Cases 1 - 10 of 359
(PC) Herrera v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01660
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Herrera
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Atkins and Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCracken v. Atkins et al
as 9:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stewart A. McCracken
Defendant:
Ethan Atkins, Eric Lindauer and Mineral County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake T16 Sorelle Owner, LLC v. Diamon Atkins
as 5:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Drake T16 Sorelle Owner, LLC
Defendant:
Diamon Atkins
Atkins v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Lisa Atkins
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poon-Atkins et al v. Poon et al
as 4:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Christy Poon-Atkins, Rhonda Barnette, Kesha Poon and others
Defendant:
John Poon and David Poon
Phelps v. EAH Housing et al
as 3:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
EAH Housing, Yolanda Latrail, Odysey Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Christopher Atkins v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Atkins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Phelps v. DOE et al
as 4:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
Yolanda DOE, CEO of E.A.H. Housing, Angela DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
