Cases 1 - 10 of 55,815
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Two and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Estate of Michael Rogel v. Bozeman City Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Rogel
Defendant:
Bozeman City Police Department, Justin Chaffins, Zachary Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE 1 et al v. BANYAN TREATMENT AND RECOVERY, LLC
as 5:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant:
BANYAN TREATMENT AND RECOVERY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
McColl v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
James John McColl
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Everett Arrington, Jr. John Collins, Loretta Maynor and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
John B. Gomez
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
