Cases 1 - 10 of 1,222
Lucas v. LVGV, LLC
as 2:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Catherine Aguinaldo Lucas
Defendant:
LVGV, LLC doing business as M Resort Spa Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Schneider v. Kindred et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Lucas Schneider
Defendant:
Joshua Kindred and Mariana Carpeneti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner:
David Lee Lucas
Respondent:
Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vera Esquivel, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2737
Plaintiff:
MARLENE GUADALUPE VERA ESQUIVEL and SALVADOR MORALES LUCAS
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
McVeigh et al v. Income Properties One LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05320
Plaintiff:
William Lucas McVeigh
Defendant:
Income Properties One LLC, Andrew Pierce and Dimension Law Group PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Lucas-Cristobal, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2666
Petitioner:
CARLOS LUCAS-CRISTOBAL and CARLOS LUCAS-NICOLAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A) v. Lucas Fick et al
as 2:2024cv03431
Plaintiff:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A)
Defendant:
Lucas Fick and The Estate of Lynda Doi Fick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
