Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Grigsby, et al.
as 24-628
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: AARON GRIGSBY
Defendant: MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP, PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Receiver: GEOFF WINKLER, Receiver for J&J Consulting Services, Inc., J&J Consulting Services, Inc., J and J Purchasing LLC, The Judd Irrevocable Trust, and BJ Holdings LLC
USSEC v. Matthew Beasley, et al
as 23-15512
Plaintiff / Appellee: U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Petitioner / Appellant: OMID SHAHABE and KRISTIE YOUNG, Proposed Intervenors
Receiver: GEOFF WINKLER
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 22-35699
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES
Defendant / Appellee: M. ROJAS, In her official and individual capacity as law librarian of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, PAYNTER, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Officer-in-Charge of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, HOUSTON, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Reviewing Officer of Misconduct Report at the Snake River Correctional Institution and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley, et al.
as 2:2022mc00034
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Matthew Wade Beasley, Beasley Law Group PC, Jeffrey J Judd and others
Receiver: Geoff Winkler
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00612
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Matthew Wade Beasley, Christopher R. Humphries, J&J Consulting Services, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Beasley Law Group PC and Jeffrey J. Judd
Not Classified By Court: Petitioning Creditors, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Vyonne S. Mendenhall and others
Interested Party: Nevada Housing Solutions, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. and others
Receiver: Danny Ayala, as court appointed receiver for Beasley Law Group LPC, Geoff Winkler and Credit Union 1
Cross Claimant: Jason A. Jenne
Intervenor Plaintiff: Omid Shahabe and Kristie Young
In Re: Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Aaron Grigsby and Grigsby Law Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
U.S. Right to Know v. United States Defense Threat Reduction Agency
as 3:2022cv00299
Plaintiff: U.S. Right to Know
Defendant: United States Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Threats v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00333
Petitioner: Lonzell J Threats
Respondent: C Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lonzell Threats v. J. Shartle
as 21-16302
Petitioner / Appellant: LONZELL J. THREATS
Respondent / Appellee: J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, named as Warden Shartle
FTC-Forward Threat Control, LLC v. Dominion Harbor Enterprises, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv06590
Defendant: Dominion Harbor Enterprises, LLC, Monument Patent Holdings, LLC, FTC Sensors, LLC and others
Plaintiff: FTC - Forward Threat Control, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 19-35594
Defendant / Appellee: J. HOLLOPETER, In his Official and Individual Corridor Officer on Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BILL DOMAN, in his official and individual capacity as acting assistant superintendent of correctional rehabilitation and senior supervisor of law library services and M. Rojas and H. Mackenzie at the Snake River Correctional Institution, MARK NOOTH, in his individual and official capacity as eastside institution administrator of the Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, AKA Charles J. Johnson, AKA Charles James Johnson, AKA Asmar H. Saleem, AKA Asmar Habeeb-Ullah Saleem

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?