Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Barrett v. Splawn et al
as 1:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lee Barrett
Defendant:
Chief Bill Splawn, Lt C Freeburg, Ernest Coxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheever v. Glasser et al
as 6:2019cv01549
Defendant:
Heidi Sternhagen, Ms. Burgess, Glasser and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Adam Cheever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kissack v. Aramark Campus, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00184
Plaintiff:
Brandi Kissack
Defendant:
Aramark FHC Campus Services, LLC, Aramark Food & Supply Services Group, Inc., Aramark Campus, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lowell Jackson v. Eddie Climmer, et al
as 18-35235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL EDWARD JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE CLIMMER, BILL BRADY and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, Inc.
Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Inc., Bill Brady and Eddie Climmer
Plaintiff:
Lowell Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Duvall v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01076
Defendant:
Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Services, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Duvall
Maier v. Snohomish County Corrections Bureau et al
as 2:2017cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael John Maier
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Bureau , Aston , Belinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Umatilla County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv01379
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Stewart Harp, Thoren Hearn and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Howard Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. County of Las Vegas, Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv01658
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Attorney for the public, Budgeting Financial Department and others
Plaintiff:
Nicki Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
