Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Flores-Reyes v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Hogla Flores-Reyes
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sgt. Bryan Kirwin, Officer B. Redd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Hernandez v. USA
as 2:2021cv01687
Respondent:
USA and Andres Gonzalez-Jaramillo
Petitioner:
Andres Gonzalez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andres Gonzalez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71352
Petitioner:
ANDRES GONZALEZ and APOLONIA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Francisca Andres-Gonzalez, et al v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70255
Petitioner:
FRANCISCA ANDRES-GONZALEZ and DIEGO CHRISTOPHER ESTEBAN-ANDRES
Respondent:
SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Cardenas et al v. Westside AG, Inc.
as 1:2016at00137
Plaintiff:
Atsiri Cardenas , Raul Pina , Honoria Garcia and others
Defendant:
Westside AG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Cardenas et al v. Westside AG, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
Atsiri Cardenas , Raul Pina , Honoria Garcia and others
Defendant:
Westside AG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Francisco Gonzalez Santos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71864
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ANDRES GONZALEZ SANTOS, AKA Francisco Gonzalez Santos
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Gonzalez Gonzalez v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv02550
Plaintiff:
Andres Gonzalez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Andres Gonzalez v. Edward J. Caden
as 12-55018
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDRES GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD J. CADEN, Warden
Andres Gonzalez v. People of the State of California
as 2:2004cv04795
Respondent:
Edward J Caden and People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Andres Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
