Cases 1 - 10 of 321
United States of America v. Tate
as 24-2912
Defendant:
ANDREW TATE, Batman, Burt Norwood and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burt v. Ramos et al
as 3:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jamel Burt
Defendant:
Nicolai Ramos and County of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois v. Cashman et al
as 3:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Defendant:
Sarah Cashman, Dillan Cashman, Brett Rudolph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Raymond Fahnbulleh v. Mercedes-Benz of Beverly Hills et al
as 2:2023cv06020
Plaintiff:
Raymond Fahnbulleh
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz of Beverly Hills and Robert Burt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Burton Hill et al v. Wendt et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Chad Burton Hill and Louiza Bissette
Defendant:
David Wendt, Paul Burt, Ted Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Olive Trust v. Sally Burt et al
as 2:2023cv03765
Plaintiff:
The Olive Trust
Defendant:
Sally Burt and Does 1 to 5
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Schleiger v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05056
Plaintiff:
Burt Schleiger
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America v. Rhodes
as 23-613
Defendant / Appellant:
BURTE GUCCI RHODES and Moeshawn
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
