Cases 1 - 10 of 691
Barton v. Walmart Inc., et al.
as 24-2649
Plaintiff:
NATHEN W. BARTON
Defendant:
WALMART INC., JOHN DOE, 1-10 and SHOUJING ZHOU
Black v. Massey et al
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Johnathan R. Black
Defendant:
Caprice Massey, Patrick Garrett, Seth Honl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rice v. City and County of San Francisco
as 24-2217
Plaintiff:
ALLISON BARTON RICE, an individual
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Barton v. Real Innovation Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05194
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Real Innovation Inc, Richardson Marketing Group LLC, Deryck D Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Burton vs Southern Hills Pavilion
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ariana Barton and Ariana Burton
Defendant:
Southern Hills Pavilion, Dr. Alshiek, Dr. Prenard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barton v. Pinnacle Home Improvements LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05142
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Pinnacle Home Improvements, LLC and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kelly Barton Terry v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kelly Barton Terry
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
