Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ewing v. Rogers, et al.
as 24-466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTON A. EWING
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES C. ROGERS and CHUCK "BUCK" ROGERS REALITY, INC., a California corporation
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Rogers
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Charles C Rogers and Chuck "Buck" Rogers Reality, Inc.
Rogers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Ayla C. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Samuel C. Rogers v. State of CA, et al
as 2:2020cv08809
Petitioner:
Samuel C. Rogers
Respondent:
State of California, Carol Rose and Steve Cooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of CA, et al
as 3:2020cv01762
Defendant:
Carol Rose, State of California and Steve Cooley
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rogers v. Republic Services Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Rogers, Jr
Defendant:
Regional Disposal Company, Republic Services Leasing Company LLC, Republic Services of Florida Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 18-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
