Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Gentry, Sr. et al v. City of Hayward et al
as 4:2024cv02593
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Gentry, Sr., Terry Christopher Ray Gentry, Jr. and P. G.
Defendant:
City of Hayward and George Correia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lipska v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Lipska and Christopher Ray Hare
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Ray v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lipska v. Deffenbacher et al
as 6:2020cv01801
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Lipska and Christopher Ray Hare
Defendant:
Senior Editor Bob Romig, Journalist Chelsea Deffenbacher and Managing Editor Michelle Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metzger v. USA
as 1:2018cv00097
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peoples v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Peoples
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Peoples v. Premier Van Lines International
as 4:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Peoples
Defendant:
Premier Van Lines International
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PEOPLES v. PREMIER VAN LINES
as 3:2018cv00969
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAY PEOPLES
Defendant:
PREMIER VAN LINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 1:2018at00279
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MARTIN, SHIRLEY MORKAL, BRENT FARRIS and others
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peoples v. Premier Van Lines
as 4:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Peoples
Defendant:
Premier Van Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
