Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Johnson v. Andes
as 5:2024cv03722
Plaintiff:
Walter Johnson
Defendant:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Chance v. De La Cruz
as 1:2024cv00709
Petitioner:
Leslie Jenea Chance
Respondent:
A. De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Churchill et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, a foreign company
as 1:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Churchill and Chanc Guffey
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
John B. Gomez
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Andes
as 5:2024cv01292
Petitioner:
Vester L. Patterson
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jon Mark La Chance v. Martin J O Malley
as 8:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Jon Mark La Chance
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(HC) Brown v. Andes
as 2:2024cv00742
Petitioner:
Shawn C. Brown
Respondent:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DePriest v. Andes
as 24-2261
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEPRIEST
Respondent:
CHANCE ANDES, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
DeCastro v. Mcknight et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jose M DeCastro
Defendant:
Evan Mcknight, Pam Wagner, Brad Spoljaric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jon Mark La Chance v. Martin J O Malley
as 2:2024cv02634
Plaintiff:
Jon Mark La Chance
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
