Cases 1 - 10 of 954
(PS) Garcia v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv02532
Defendant:
Bobby Chapman and George Robinson
Plaintiff:
Stephen Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chapman v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv02474
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Alonzo Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01477
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Chapman v. BMW of North America LLC
as 3:2024cv05738
Plaintiff:
Daryn Chapman
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Chatine Dickey-Johnson et al v. Ticketmaster, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv06940
Defendant:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and Ticketmaster L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
CHASTINE DICKEY-JOHNSON and SERENA CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chapman, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02222
Plaintiff:
Paull Scott Chapman, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chapman, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at01047
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Paull Scott Chapman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chapman v. City of Coos Bay, et al.
as 24-4972
Defendant:
PETER EMERSON KIRK, GARRY MCCULLOUGH, CHRISTOPHER CHAPANAR and others
Plaintiff:
ALLISON KATE CHAPMAN
United States of America v. Chapman
as 24-4939
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN MATTHEW CHAPMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
