Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 366
City of Pomona v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al.
as 2:2024cv03957
Plaintiff: City of Pomona
Defendant: Dow Chemical Company The and Shell USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al
as 2:2024at00376
Plaintiff: Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant: Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff: Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant: Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Graham et al v. DuPont de Nemours, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01551
Plaintiff: Laurence J Graham, Laurence John Graham, Larry Graham and others
Defendant: DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Dow, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gerald A. Gauthier v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01951
Plaintiff: Gerald A Gauthier
Defendant: 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Intervenor: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Compay, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Internal Revenue Services et al
as 2:2024cv01775
Defendant: Gary Sinise, Internal Revenue Services, California Victim Compensation Board and others
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant: ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff: James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Diamond Chemical Company, Inc. et al v. Gurtler Chemical, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09595
Plaintiff: DIAMOND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. and MICHAEL HEBERT
Defendant: GURTLER CHEMICAL, INC. dba GURTLER INDUSTRIES, INC., Gurtler Chemical, Inc. an Illinois Corporation doing business as Gurtler Industries, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?