Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gerald Bowers, et al v. Denali State Bank, et al
as 22-35286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD L. BOWERS, BOWERS INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC., BOWERS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DENALI STATE BANK, DENALI BANCORP, INC., STEVE LUNDGREN and others
IN RE: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02295
Plaintiff:
Inna Badran, Morris Padulo, Chenelle McCall and others
Defendant:
PRA Group, Inc., Neal Stern, Cynthia Patterson and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America and Avaya Inc.
Petitioner:
Sharina Talbot Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowers et al v. Denali State Bank et al
as 4:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Dena' Nena' Henash, First National Bank Alaska, Denali Bancorp Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yukon Maxi-Storage, Gerald L. Bowers, Bowers General Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Tangwall et al v. Satterberg et al
as 4:2020cv00040
Defendant:
George E. Boscher, William R. Satterberg, Jr., Paul R. Lyle and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Tangwall and Donna Uphues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2016cv02553
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell , Armando Aguilar , Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zimmerman v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv01401
Plaintiff:
Paul Christopher Zimmerman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thomas Cares v. State of California, et al
as 12-57113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON CARES
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, KING, Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LOWRY, Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff, AKA Lowry, AARON BLOUNT, Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff, JONATHAN SNEED, Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff, AKA Sneed and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
