Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Andrews v. Wilson Electric Services Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Andrews
Defendant:
Wilson Electric Services Corporation and Wilson Electric Services Corporation Plan Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Andrews v. City of Saint Helens et al
as 3:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Ashley D. Andrews
Defendant:
City of Saint Helens, Adam S. Raethke, Jamin W. Coy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DCCM Investment Corp. v. Mary C. Tejuoso et al
as 5:2019cv01213
Defendant:
Frank D Andrews, Does 1-10, Inclusive and Mary C. Tejuoso
Plaintiff:
DCCM Investment Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Andrews v. Bonner County et al
as 2:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
Robin D Andrews
Defendant:
Bonner County, Bonner County Sheriff's Department, Daryl Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2015cv05871
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and Dan Bauman
Plaintiff:
Shelley D. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Subramaniam v. Beal et al
as 3:2015cv02002
Defendant:
D. Andrew Beal, Lorraine Brown, Does 1 through 50 and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Subramaniam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Subramaniam v. Beal et al
as 3:2012cv01681
Defendant:
Masse Adjety, David Allison, Ally Financial and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Subramaniam
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Terran D Andrews v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2011cv02676
Plaintiff:
Terran D Andrews
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.