Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United Cook Inlet Drift Association, et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al.
as 23-3833
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED COOK INLET DRIFT ASSOCIATION, COOK INLET FISHERMEN'S FUND, WES HUMBYRD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as the United States Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA
United Cook Inlet Drift Association et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
United Cook Inlet Drift Association, Cook Inlet Fishermen's Fund, Wes Humbyrd and others
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gina Raimondo and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Humbyrd et al v. Raimondo et al
as 3:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
Wes Humbyrd, Robert Wolf and Dan Anderson
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, Janet Coit and National Marine Fisheries Service
Jeremy Reed et al v. USPLabs, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03281
Plaintiff:
Dan Anderson, Timothy Anderson, Jonathan Asahi and others
Defendant:
Does, Jonathan Vincent Doyle, GNC Corporation and others
An Individual:
Jacob Geissler
Summers v. Glebe et al
as 3:2015cv05102
Plaintiff:
Duane Lee Summers
Defendant:
Pat Glebe, Glen Davis, James Alif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed et al v. USPLABS, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv03135
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reed , Timothy Anderson , Dan Anderson and others
Defendant:
USPLABS, LLC , Jonathan Vincent Doyle , Jacob Geissler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Ross Bros. & Company, Inc., et al v. State of Oregon, et al
as 6:2008cv06300
Plaintiff:
Ross Bros. & Company, Inc.,, Ross Bros. & Company, Inc.,, Ross Bros. Construction, Inc and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Bob Pappe, Dan Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
