Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gutierrez v. Displate Corporation
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez
Defendant:
Displate Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Humphries et al v. Button
as 2:2021cv01412
Plaintiff:
Sage Humphries, Gina Menichino, RoseMarie DeAngelo and others
Defendant:
Mitchell Taylor Button
Counter Defendant:
Danielle Gutierrez, Juliet Doherty and Jane Doe 200
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Dusty Button
3Rd Party Defendant:
Michael S. Humphries, Micah L. Humphries, Anthony G. Deane and others
Young v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv02441
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Daniel Gutierrez (7441), County of San Diego, Deputy Sheriff Chad Fickett (0277) and others
Plaintiff:
Joe M. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Daniel Gutierrez v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv01731
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gutierrez v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04726
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jesus Robles-Larios
as 2:2017mj01388
Material Witne:
Dalia Bahena-Garcia, Nelson Barrera-Estrada and Daniel Gutierrez-Lepe
Defendant:
Jesus Robles-Larios (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. Robles-Larios
as 2:2017mj01388
Material Witne:
Dalia Bahena-Garcia, Nelson Barrera-Estrada and Daniel Gutierrez-Lepe
Defendant:
Jesus Robles-Larios (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Daniel Gutierrez v. Family Dollar, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04556
Defendant:
Does and Family Dollar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez
Daniel Figueroa v. Onewest Bank FSB et al
as 5:2011cv00187
Defendant:
Does, Indymac Mortgage Services, MTC Financial Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez Figueroa
Gutierrez v. Arpaio
as 2:2009cv01576
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez
Defendant:
Joesph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
