Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Houston v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-840
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MAYOR, MIRANDA M. DU, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Dunbar Village L.P. v. David D. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv09834
Plaintiff:
Dunbar Village L.P.
Defendant:
David D. Jones and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Dunbar Village, L.P. v. David D. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv09078
Plaintiff:
Dunbar Village, L.P.
Defendant:
David Daryl Jones and Does 1 Through 20, Inclusive
(PC) Pierre-Jones v. Campos
as 1:2023cv01372
Plaintiff:
David Pierre-Jones
Defendant:
I. Campos and A. Palencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierre-Jones v. Campos
as 1:2023at00795
Plaintiff:
David Pierre-Jones
Defendant:
I Campos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
David Jones, et al v. Myvette Goldburn, et al
as 23-55537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID DARYL JONES and JESSIE JOSHUA JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
MYVETTE GOLDBURN, Deputy and DOES, 1-15
Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
as 23-15810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Matthew Houston v. Joe Lombardo, et al
as 23-15298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, Clerk is directed to accept no further filings in this closed action, ECF No. 31
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Matthew Houston v. Joe Lombardo, et al
as 23-15067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MIRANDA M. DU and others
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01828
Plaintiff:
David Norman Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
