Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Peterson v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Dennis Peterson
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dennis Peterson
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jody Carr, et al v. Josh Tewalt, et al
as 22-35743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODY R.O. CARR
Plaintiff:
DOUBLE CELLED CLOSE CUSTODY INMATES OF IDOC, RANDALL ERICKSON, RONALD BAKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC, CHAD PAGE, AMANDA GENTRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Clay
as 4:2020cv04304
Defendant:
Michael E. Delllastrillo, Toni Cantil-Sakauye, Andrew G. Schopler and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Ronald Clacker, Forensic Mental Health Facility, Nick Aemisegger and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swetnam v. Peterson et al
as 1:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Swetnam
Defendant:
Dennis Peterson, M. Siegel, T. Oppliger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ryan Corley, Samuel Frank, Nicholas Corpuz and others
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. CJ America, Inc.
as 3:2014cv02570
Plaintiff:
Dennis Peterson
Defendant:
CJ America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mason et al v. City of Lake Forest Park et al
as 2:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Michele Mason and Michael Gilmore
Defendant:
City of Lake Forest Park, Tony Matthews, Steven Parken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
