Cases 1 - 10 of 262
Donnelly v. Cagle et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Donnelly
Defendant:
John C. Cagle, Melissa Howard and Elvina Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olmos #196384 v. Copciac et al
as 3:2024cv08048
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Defendant:
Amanda Copciac, Jocelyn Myers, Jeff Gallimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnelly v. Cagle et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Donnelly
Defendant:
John C. Cagle, Melissa Howard and Elvina Meyer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu, et al.
as 24-457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGARAJAN DURAISAMY
Defendant / Appellee:
PRADEEP PULI RUKMANGATHA SAIRAM BABU, KOUSALYA NAGARAJAN, HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and others
Williams v. Minev, et al.
as 23-4155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MINEV, R. DONNELLY, B. EGERTON and others
Elgen Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Mac Arthur Co. et al
as 3:2023cv04924
Plaintiff:
Elgen Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Mac Arthur Co. and John Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Ruiz v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 23-3312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JERI FEDERICKS and others
Warren v. Hultenschmidt et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Warren and Keith Allen Warren
Defendant:
Desiree Hultenschmidt, Erin Parks, Kara LeGrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnelly v. Cagle et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Donnelly
Defendant:
John C. Cagle, Melissa Howard and Timothy Ayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
