Cases 1 - 10 of 2,341
Love v. O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv06590
Plaintiff:
Desmond Earl Love
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Woods
as 3:2024cv06332
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gray v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2024cv02401
Defendant:
M. Muslim, S. McCambridge, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Downey v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Insurance et al
as 2:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Roy Earl Downey
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Walid v. Wisdom et al
as 3:2024cv01452
Defendant:
Liberty NW Homes, LLC, Selena Wilkes, Doyle Law and others
Plaintiff:
Rasta K. Walid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01366
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gay v. Dodd et al
as 5:2024cv05235
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Gay
Defendant:
Attorney Andrew Love, CAP Agency, Attorney Lynne S. Coffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bosse v. Thompson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00365
Defendant:
Ian Thompson, David Simonitus, Marco Deangelo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Bosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Johnson v. California Superior Court
as 2:2024cv02145
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
California Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Parlor
as 24-4873
Defendant:
LONNIE EARL PARLOR
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
