Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lucy Caldera v. Education Management Corporation
as 2:2015cv06095
Plaintiff:
Lucy Caldera
Defendant:
Education Management Corporation
Patrick Sturge v. Education Management Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00547
Defendant:
Argosy Education Group Inc., Does, Education Management Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sturge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Piange Jackson v. Argosy University, On-Line Div, et al
as 14-16538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIANGE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARGOSY UNIVERSITY, ON-LINE DIVISION, ARGOSY UNIVERSITY, ARGOSY UNIVERSITY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Jackson v. Argosy University, On-Line Division et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Defendant:
Argosy University, Argosy University Education Management, LLC, Argosy University of Argosy Education Group and others
Plaintiff:
Piange Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stirrup v. Education Management LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01063
Plaintiff:
Joi N Stirrup
Defendant:
Education Management LLC and Education Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Jackson v. Argosy University, On-Line Division et al
as 2:2012cv02091
Defendant:
Argosy University, Argosy University Education Management, LLC, Argosy University of Argosy Education Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Piange Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.