Cases 1 - 10 of 442
Evatt v. Comprehensive Life Resources
as 3:2024cv05790
Defendant:
Comprehensive Life Resources
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Evatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Evatt v. Simbeck et al
as 3:2024cv05772
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Evatt
Defendant:
Kirk Medina, Brandon Avalos and Paul Simbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Singh v. City of Placerville et al
as 2:2024cv02454
Defendant:
City of Placerville, Mark S. Adams and Samuel Emerson
Plaintiff:
Raj Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Daniel Emerson Norton v. Israel Jacquez
as 5:2024cv01852
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chapman v. City of Coos Bay, et al.
as 24-4972
Defendant:
PETER EMERSON KIRK, GARRY MCCULLOUGH, CHRISTOPHER CHAPANAR and others
Plaintiff:
ALLISON KATE CHAPMAN
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01321
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nolasco-Argueta v. Garland
as 24-4486
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
OSCAR EMERSON NOLASCO-ARGUETA
Daniel Emerson Norton v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01370
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Warden J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Monlux v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Defendant:
Valves and Controls US Inc formerly known as Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc doing business as Atwood & Morrill Co Inc, WestRock Company, Cleaver-Brooks Inc formerly known as Aqua-Chem Inc doing business as Cleaver-Brooks Division and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine M Monlux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
