Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Todd R.G. Hill et al v. The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law et al
as 2:2023cv01298
Defendant:
Hector Candelario Pena Ramirez, Jessica Viramontes, The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. G. Hill
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(HC) Starr v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 2:2022cv00297
Petitioner:
Robin G. Starr and Robin Gillen Starr
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillen-Garcia et al v. Met Life Auto & Home et al
as 3:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Amy Gillen-Garcia and Osvaldo Garcia
Defendant:
Alison Wacksman, Met Life Auto & Home and Cathy Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in
(PS) Starr v. Ortega Gonzalez et al
as 2:2019cv02576
Defendant:
Sophia Ortega Gonzalez, Triple A Auto Insurance and Cal State Auto Association
Plaintiff:
Robin Gillen Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anshu Bharat Pathak v. Sunil Bhasin et al
as 5:2017cv00521
Defendant:
Allied Global Care, Allied Global Care, Inc., Sunil Bhasin and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Bharat Pathak
Robin Starr v. United States
as 2:2017cv00206
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Robin Gillen Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2016cv03033
Petitioner:
Robin Gillen Starr
Respondent:
CDCR, BOP and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starr v. United States et al
as 2:2016cv01829
Plaintiff:
Robin Gillen Starr
Defendant:
United States and David Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. United States et al
as 2:2016cv00589
Petitioner:
Robin Gillen Starr
Respondent:
United States of America and K. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starr v. Cano
as 2:2016cv00510
Petitioner:
Robin Gillen Starr
Respondent:
Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
