Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Langworthy v. Washington Department of Social and Health Services
as 3:2024cv05373
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Washington Department of Social and Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2976
Plaintiff:
GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant:
CLALLAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALEX SCHODOWSKI, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge, DAVE NEUPERT, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge and others
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv05340
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Clallam County Sheriff, Brent Basden, Alex Schodowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angela Corona et al v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Angela Corona, Elizabeth Campbell, Elizabeth Middleton and others
Defendant:
State Of California, State of California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Tina Dhillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Langworthy v. Perky, et al.
as 24-2579
Plaintiff:
GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant:
CAROLINA PERKY, LAURA HAMILTON, PABLO VILLARREAL and others
Abitbol v. Geneva Financial LLC
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David Abitbol
Defendant:
Geneva Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CAB Plus 1 Properties, LLC v. Kristina Belova et al
as 2:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
CAB Plus 1 Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Kristina Belova, Geneva Erickson and Does 1 to 5
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv05258
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Clallam County Sheriff, Alex Schodowski, Dave Neupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Langworthy v. Myers
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Zach Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
