Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv04628
Plaintiff:
Gregory David Miller
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Randal Dalavai v. University of California San Diego Health, et al
as 23-55411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDAL JEROME DALAVAI
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO HEALTH, Hospital entity unknown, AKA UC San Diego Health, INLAND VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, Hospital, DR. TIMOTHY M. FERNANDES, M.D. and others
USA v. Gregory Werber
as 22-30195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY DAVID WERBER
Dalavai v. University of California San Diego Health et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Defendant:
University of California San Diego Health, UC San Diego Health, Inland Valley Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Randal Jerome Dalavai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
Gregory Werber v. Warden
as 22-55791
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY DAVID WERBER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, United States Penitentiary, Lompoc
Werber v. Residential Reentry Manager
as 2:2022cv01066
Petitioner:
Gregory David Werber
Respondent:
Residential Reentry Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gregory David Werber v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lompoc
as 2:2021cv07018
Petitioner:
Gregory David Werber
Respondent:
Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lompoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Gregory Werber
as 21-30140
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY DAVID WERBER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Cate, et al
as 2:2014cv02514
Plaintiff:
Gregory David Johnson
Defendant:
M Cate and J. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Cate, et al
as 1:2014cv01771
Plaintiff:
Gregory David Johnson
Defendant:
M Cate and J. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
