Cases 1 - 10 of 15
William Howard v. County of Riverside, et al
as 14-56197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM H HOWARD
Defendant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and ARMANDO MUNOZ
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 12-16840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, SCOTT MACMILLAN BAKER and others
William F. Howard v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2012cv00700
Defendant:
Cathedral City, County of Riverside, Does and others
Plaintiff:
William F Howard and William H Howard
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 12-15223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, SCOTT MACMILLAN BAKER and others
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2011cv00727
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson et al v. McGrath, et al
as 2:2011cv01175
Plaintiff:
Carl Anderson , Rosalie Anderson , Robert F Barton and others
Defendant:
Gregory K McGrath, John A Ensign, Daniel P Buettin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Willie Bailey, III v. J Wedell, et al
as 10-17750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE BAILEY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
J WEDELL, J. TURELLA, JOHN H. HOWARD and others
Vigil v. Yates, et al.
as 1:2010cv01977
Plaintiff:
Willie Paul Vigil, Jr.
Defendant:
James A. Yates, D. Revees, R Valencia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilbur Pittman v. Matthew Martel et al
as 5:2009cv01640
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Pittman
Defendant:
M. Martel, D. Pearson, P. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Southerhill et al
as 2:2009cv02316
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
S. L. Southerhill, D. Pearson, H. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
