Cases 1 - 10 of 18
J. G. v. Boeing Company Master Welfare Plan, et al
as 23-35212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. G., By and through his parents and guardians, C.G. and L.R.
Defendant / Appellant:
BOEING COMPANY MASTER WELFARE PLAN, BOEING COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE and BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS, a division of Health Care Service Corporation of Illinois State PAC NFP
The United States v. State of Idaho
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
J.G. v. The Boeing Company Master Welfare Plan et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv01510
Defendant:
The Boeing Company Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, a division of Health Care Service Corporation of Illinois State PAC NFP, The Boeing Company Master Welfare Plan and others
Plaintiff:
JG by and through his parents and guardians, LR, CG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Johnnie Garrett v. People of Illinois State, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv01850
Respondent:
Sheriff, Warden, Pleople of Illinois State and others
Petitioner:
Johnnie Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnnie Garrett et al v. Illinois State et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2018cv02930
Petitioner:
Johnnie Garrett and China Anne McClain
Respondent:
Illinois State, People of Sheriff and Warden
Garrett v. People of Illinois, State et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2017cv01277
Defendant:
Judge, Police Officers, State Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McClain et al v. People of Illinois, State et al
as 3:2017cv00922
Defendant:
Attorney, Counsel, Lawyers and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Johnnie Garrett and Ms. Chins Sme McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Defendant:
James Reynolds, II, Cancer Fund of America Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Breast Cancer Financial Assistance Fund, Cancer Support Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Receiver:
Receivership Management Incorporated
Petitioner:
First Tennessee Bank NA, Associated Community Services Incorporated and Central Processing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing Incorporated et al
as 2:2014mc00031
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , Illinois, State of , Kentucky, Commonwealth of and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing Incorporated , FHTM Incorporated , Alan Clark Holdings LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Barlow Respiratory Hospital v. Health Care Service Corporation Illinois State PAC, NFP et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv01279
Plaintiff:
Barlow Respiratory Hospital
Defendant:
Does and Health Care Service Corporation Illinois State PAC, NFP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.