Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Eun Lim v. City of Irvine, et al
as 23-55661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN JUNG LIM
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF IRVINE, CITY OF IRVINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE NUTTER, Police Officer, Badge No. 635, individual and official capacity and others
Eun Lim v. City of Irvine, et al
as 23-55221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN JUNG LIM
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF IRVINE, CITY OF IRVINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE NUTTER, Police Officer, Badge No. 635, individual and official capacity and others
Eun Lim v. City of Irvine, et al
as 23-55178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN JUNG LIM
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF IRVINE, CITY OF IRVINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE NUTTER, Police Officer, Badge No. 635, individual and official capacity and others
Rick Ames et al v. Patrick Nelson et al
as 2:2022cv09400
Plaintiff:
Rick Ames, Veronica Ames, Ellyn Levine and others
Defendant:
Patrick Nelson, Nelson Partners, LLC, AXONIC CAPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Eun Jung Lim v. Irvine City et al
as 8:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Eun Jung Lim
Defendant:
Irvine City, Sergeant-Detective Sean Paul Crawford, Michele Hinig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00709
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watson et al v. Ramirez
as 1:2021cv00362
Defendant:
Jose Ramirez
Plaintiff:
James Moore and Kathy Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stuart C. Irby Company v. Moore
as 3:2021mc80036
Defendant:
James Moore
Plaintiff:
Stuart C. Irby Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02262
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
