Cases 1 - 10 of 102
James Johnson v. Los Angeles County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2024cv07698
Defendant:
Robert Luna and Los Angeles County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Johnson v. Los Angeles County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2024cv07766
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Luna and Los Angeles County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. O'Malley, et al.
as 24-4808
Defendant:
DOES, 1 to 100 and 4 to 100, MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ERIC V. BENHAM, Administrative Law Judge and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Johnson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00265
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. San Mateo County
as 3:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321 Plant Variety Protection Act
Johnson v. San Mateo County
as 3:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
San Mateo County and Christopher Armanino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reyna et.al.
as 3:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Johnson and Mr. James C Johnson
Defendant:
Renee C. Reyna and San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gancarz et al v. Capito
as 2:2023cv01113
Defendant:
David Alan Capito, II and Vyacheslav Arkangelskiy
Plaintiff:
Paul Gancarz, Daniel Turetchi, Colton Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Burkill, LLC v. James Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv04395
Plaintiff:
Burkill, LLC
Defendant:
James Johnson and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
