Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Bridgewater v. Schmitz et al
as 2:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Keywanie S Bridgewater
Defendant:
Zach Schmitz, Michael Jason Jayson and James L Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James Miller v. Scott Harris
as 23-55371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, Individual and Official Capacity
James L. Miller v. Scott S. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
James L. Miller
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Miller v. Amir Kashani, et al
as 21-56015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMIR KASHANI, Dr., L.A.C. AND U.S.C. MEDICAL CENTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, Oriental Dr./Physician; #1 and others
James Miller v. Amir Kashani, et al
as 21-55384
Defendant / Appellee:
L.A.C. AND U.S.C. MEDICAL CENTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, Oriental Dr./Physician; #1, JOHN DOE, #3 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MILLER
Miller v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al
as 2:2020cv01930
Plaintiff:
James L Miller
Defendant:
Kate Gallego, Kyrsten Sinema, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Miller v. Virginia Phillips, et al
as 19-56385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES and VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, individual and official capacity
James Miller v. Scott Harris, et al
as 19-56319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, in his individual and official capacity and DOES
James L. Miller v. Virginia A. Phillips et al
as 2:2019cv08909
Plaintiff:
James L. Miller
Defendant:
Virginia A. Phillips and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
