Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Joseph Moore v. M. Palmer, et al
as 23-55316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH C. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
M. PALMER, Chief Deputy Warden, D. LEWIS, Associate Warden, A. TAYLOR, Correctional Counselor II and others
Joseph Moore v. W.M. Pollard, et al
as 22-55538
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH C. MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
W.M. POLLARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Moore v. Palmer et al
as 3:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Moore
Defendant:
M. Palmer, D. Lewis, A. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph C. Moore v. WM Pollard et al
as 2:2019cv07771
Respondent:
Attorney General California and W.M. Pollard
Petitioner:
Joseph C. Moore and Joseph C Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Pollard et al
as 3:2019cv01676
Respondent:
W.M. Pollard and Attorney General, California
Petitioner:
Joseph C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roundtree v. Colangelo et al
as 2:2012cv02044
Plaintiff:
Sean Alex Roundtree
Defendant:
Jerry Colangelo, Phoenix Suns LP, Robert T Sarver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Roundtree v. Colangelo et al
as 2:2012cv01491
Plaintiff:
Sean Alex Roundtree
Defendant:
Jerry Colangelo, Phoenix Suns, Bryan Colangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ubimed, Inc. v. Joseph K. Moore et al
as 2:2008cv05340
Plaintiff:
Ubimed, Inc. and Ubimed, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph K. Moore, The World Cleanose Corporation, JKM Enterprizes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Muhammad v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
Micheal Chertoff, Deval Patrick, Tim Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
