Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hill v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
J Rogers, Unknown Perry, L Tijerina and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sivatharan Natkunanathan v. USDC-CASA
as 19-73095
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA
Not Yet Classified:
REDMOND K. BARNES, individually, and as clerk and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SIVATHARAN NATKUNANATHAN
Petitioner:
SIVATHARAN NATKUNANATHAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv03676
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Eric H. Holder, Jr., Donald B. Verrilli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Primo v. Pacific Biosciences of California Inc et al
as 4:2011cv06599
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Primo, Robert Burlingame and Evan Powell
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc, Hugh C. Martin, Susan K. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sandnas v. Pacific Biosciences of California Inc et al
as 4:2011cv05669
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sandnas
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc , Hugh C. Martin , Susan K. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandnas v. Pacific Biosciences of California Inc et al
as 5:2011cv05669
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sandnas and Robert Burlingame
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc , Hugh C. Martin , Susan K. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Pacific Biosciences of California Inc et al
as 5:2011cv05668
Plaintiff:
Greg Young and Robert Burlingame
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc, Hugh C. Martin, Susan K. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mofidi v. Levy et al
as 2:2008cv01229
Plaintiff:
Mahbod Mofidi
Defendant:
Alan J Levy, Alan J Levy, Alan J Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
