Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Lang v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
Kendell Lang
Defendant:
United States of America and Philip A. Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Stephen Borowski v. T Kendell-House, et al
as 22-16189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MICHAEL BOROWSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
T KENDELL-HOUSE, Supervisor, Inmage Legal Services, MCSO and PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff of Maricopa County
Kendall Shaka Broughton v. B. Chavarria et al
as 2:2022cv05530
Plaintiff:
Kendell Shaka Broughton
Defendant:
B. Chavarria, R. Flores-Borunda, J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Borowski v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 22-16001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MICHAEL BOROWSKI, also named as: Stephen M Borowski
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff of Maricopa County, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Safety Disposal of Hazardous Material/ Grievance Protocol at LBJ and 4th Ave. Jail, INMATE LEGAL SERVICES, named as: Inmate Legal Services - MCSO at LBJ and 4th Ave. Jail and others
Raymond Anthony Chatman v. Neil McDowell et al
as 5:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anthony Chatman
Defendant:
Neil McDowell, C. Callahan, Kendell Dawson Wasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kendel Skinner v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 21-35819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENDEL SKINNER
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Eatmon v. Warden
as 4:2020cv05596
Respondent:
Warden and Landon Bird
Petitioner:
Kendell Eatmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skinner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05800
Plaintiff:
Kendel Skinner
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Eatmon v. People of the State of Cal
as 4:2019cv07829
Plaintiff:
Kendell Eatmon
Defendant:
People of the State of Cal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
