Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Murphy v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00637
Petitioner:
Kevin Michael Murphy
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wave Neuroscience, Inc. v. PeakLogic, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01330
Plaintiff:
Wave Neuroscience, Inc.
Defendant:
PeakLogic, Inc. and Kevin T. Murphy, M.D. a Professional Corporation doing business as MindSet
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Nicole Denise Griggs v. Cottage Health/Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital et al
as 2:2021cv09821
Plaintiff:
Nicole Denise Griggs
Defendant:
Cottage Health/Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Goleta Cottage Hospital, Travis J. Mellon DO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. Tolzin
as 3:2020cv05460
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Murphy
Defendant:
Leslie E Tolzin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pastor et al
as 3:2019cv06171
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Murphy
Defendant:
J Perez, Poo Conception, D Nealis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pastor et al
as 3:2019cv06146
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Murphy
Defendant:
C Sabo, S Bual, B Stixrood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Equity Residential Management, LLC v. Kevin Casey Murphy
as 2:2019cv04942
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 10, inclusive and Kevin Casey Murphy
Plaintiff:
Equity Residential Management, LLC
Von Brinken v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02148
Plaintiff:
Tarahawk Von Brinken
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, James Michael Voss, Unknown Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BizziBiz Franchise Incorporated v. Murphy et al
as 2:2011cv00864
Plaintiff:
BizziBiz Franchise Incorporated
Defendant:
Kevin B Murphy and Franchise Foundations PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Hartley
as 3:2010cv01319
Petitioner:
Kevin L Murphy
Respondent:
James D Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
