Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gerald Bollfrass, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 22-16485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD BOLLFRASS and FRANK CZYZEWSKI, a married couple
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, PHOENIX HOUSING DEPARTMENT, named as The City of Phoenix Housing Department, a federally funded public housing program, DINA FERNANDEZ, an individual and others
Dream Games of AZ, et al v. PC Onsite LLC, et al
as 2:2003cv00433
Plaintiff:
Dream Games of Arizona Incorporated and American Software Development Company Incorporated
Garnishee:
Chase Bank, U.S. Bank NA, Venable, Campillo, Logan & Meaney PC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Deanna L Hogan
Defendant:
PC Onsite LLC, Affordable Video Systems Limited, Casey Hagon and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Paul Perez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Armand Calhoun v. Adison Richards, et al
as 21-35598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMAND R. CALHOUN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADISON RICHARDS, PHILIP THORNTON, JENNIFER AMMONS and others
Calhoun v. Scott et al
as 2:2021cv00981
Plaintiff:
Armand R Calhoun
Defendant:
Jaqueline Scott, Benjamin Settle, Washington Judicial Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2020cv05788
Defendant:
Amanda Vitakainen, Gerald E Johnson, Shawn Waite and others
Plaintiff:
Armand R Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James L. Hogan et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01975
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
James L. Hogan and Judith Hogan
Hogan v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv00359
Petitioner:
Marco L. Hogan
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Sisto et al
as 1:2008cv00268
Petitioner:
Marco L. Hogan
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
