Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Demaray LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (a Korean Company) et al
as 3:2021mc80305
Plaintiff:
Demaray LLC
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (a Korean Company), Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Lam Research Corporation
Fulgencio v. Lam Research Corporation
as 3:2018cv02195
Claimant:
Marc E Fulgencio
Defendant:
Lam Research Corporation
Plaintiff:
Marc E. Fulgencio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Serenita v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2018cv02087
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Long-Term Disability Plan of Lam Research Corporation
Plaintiff:
John Serenita
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lam Research Corporation v. Flamm
as 4:2015cv01277
Plaintiff:
Lam Research Corporation
Defendant:
Daniel L. Flamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
B-M et al v. LAM Research Corporation
as 2:2013cv02118
Defendant:
LAM Research Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kelsey B-M and Janelle Weispfenning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tessitore v. Novellus Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
James Tessitore
Defendant:
Novellus Systems, Inc., Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Nagpal v. Hill et al
as 5:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sunil Nagpal
Defendant:
Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey, Neil R. Bonke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
