Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lanfair v. Siebel et al
as 3:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Justin Lanfair
Defendant:
Thomas Siebel, Edward Abbo, David Barter and others
Michael Hicks v. B. Speer et al
as 2:2023cv07397
Plaintiff:
Michael J Hicks
Defendant:
B. Speer, P. Welch, M. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 4:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House and others
Rabasca v. Siebel et al
as 4:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Rabasca
Defendant:
Thomas M. Siebel, Patricia A. House, Condoleezza Rice and others
Interested Party:
C3.ai, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
(PS) Ward v. County of Sacramento Dept. of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2022cv02195
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Ward
Defendant:
County of Sacramento Department of Health and Human Services and Megan Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1666 Fair Credit Billing Act Dispute
Ward v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03092
Plaintiff:
Danielle M Ward
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Suri v. Siebel et al
as 4:2022cv03031
Plaintiff:
Naren Suri
Defendant:
Thomas M. Siebel, Patricia A. House, Richard Levin and others
The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01413
Plaintiff:
The Reckstin Family Trust, Dennis Martinez, Christie Sweeney and others
Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Siebel, David Barter and others
Petitioner:
Yining Cai, Leonard Janos, Fadi Karnaby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
