Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Hazari v. Santa Clara County Superior Court, et al.
as 24-3353
Plaintiff:
CYRUS HAZARI
Defendant:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, APPEAL COURT OF THE SIXTH DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT and others
Mosley et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Mosley, Amy Caster, Amy Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hemminger v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Hemminger, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Nelson, Paulette Storie, Sherry Kness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D. Diaz v. Paul Camacho et al
as 2:2024cv03737
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
PAUL CAMACHO, N. CALVILLO, G. PRECIADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Meza
as 24-1784
Defendant:
MARIANO MEZA and Durango
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sanchez v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dyana Sanchez and Gibson Mariano
Defendant:
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Maui Electric Company, Limited, Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(HC) Meza v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01736
Petitioner:
Mariano Meza
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reiner v. Navarette, et al.
as 23-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN REINER
Defendant / Appellee:
JORGE NAVARETTE, TOM ZHANG, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE and others
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, Eduardo Tomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
