Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mooney v. Roller Bearing Company of America Inc
as 2:2020cv01030
Defendant:
Roller Bearing Company of America, Inc. and Roller Bearing Company of America Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mooney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05103
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Mooney
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mooney v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv03006
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Mooney
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mooney v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05211
Plaintiff:
Edward Earl Mooney
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thigpen v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv01069
Plaintiff:
John Thigpen
Defendant:
Officer KC Jones , Officer Kenmore , Tom Mooney Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mooney v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv03051
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mooney
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Johnson v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2009cv00258
Plaintiff:
Naathon-Ray Johnson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Washington State Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis et al v. Nickels et al
as 2:2009cv01029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis and Lonnie Lee McClure
Defendant:
Greg Nickels, Sandra K., City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2009cv05022
Plaintiff:
Naathon-Ray Johnson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Washington State Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
