Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Chanh Trinh et al v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 2:2023cv04521
Plaintiff:
Chanh V. Trinh, Brian E. Sawyers, Dennis McPherson and others
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz, Bureau of Prisons, Law Office of Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-56033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Michael Miller
as 21-30230
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. MILLER
(PC) Miller v. Carter et al
as 2:2021cv01981
Plaintiff:
Michael Neal Miller
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Amy Nelson and Antonina Filenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Miller v. Department of Corrections and, et al
as 20-55001
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, SIERRA CONSERVATION CENTER and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Michael Miller v. Hunter Anglea
as 19-73253
Respondent:
HUNTER ANGLEA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
Miller v. Yup et al
as 3:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Miller
Defendant:
M.D. Yup, Dr. Katherine and Brian Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Anthony Miller v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv10700
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Sierra Conservation Center Warden
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03746
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv05463
Plaintiff:
Michael B Miller , Jennifer Goodger and MM
Defendant:
United States of America and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
