Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vazquez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08241
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vazquez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Vazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01646
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vazquez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Miguel Vazquez v. City of Long Beach, et al
as 17-55203
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIGUEL VAZQUEZ
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF LONG BEACH, DAVID M. FARIS, Peace Officer, MICHAEL G. HYNES, Peace Officer and others
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ricardo Miguel Vazquez et al
as 2:2015cv03662
Defendant:
Lupe Corral, Hops and Barley Alehouse, Inc., Louis Vazquez and others
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Miguel Vaquez v. City of Long Beach et al
as 2:2012cv09923
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, Does, David M Faris and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vazquez
Richard Varela, et al v. Indust. Prof. & Tech. Workers, et al
as 10-55502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD VARELA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, EDWIN WHITFORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ANDRE PRICE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL WORKERS and DONNA WALSH
Defendant:
BRINDERSON CONSTRUCTORS INC., ALAN UPDYKE and HAIRON CHOW
Richard Varela et al v. Industrial Professional and Technical Workers et al
as 2:2008cv01012
Plaintiff:
Richard Varela, Richard Rojas, Jesse Clark and others
Defendant:
Industrial Professional and Technical Workers, Brinderson Constructors Inc, Donna Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
